The movie was nostalgic. Woody Allen ties Gilles Pender (lead character) and his tremendous break through to realizing people of all times prefer the past to the present. This enables him to do what is right and important for him now and progress in his life. What I found interesting is that whether his first novel succeeds or not (so validates him to his ex fiancee and her family) is not resolved or even important. The question to be settled is does his decide to settle in Paris and not repeat his earlier mistake to leave, or does his submit to the same old groove, marry his two-timing fiancee and fall in line with the values he's trying to overcome. He does make the higher choice. And the historical personages who guide this choice for him hail from a time when questions like this were more important than if his novel succeeds or not. Or perhaps their height of creativity is a place where answering the success of his novel isn't important but there are plenty abounding then and now who would feel it is.
Leaving the cinema the bustle of Whyte Ave continued. It had not struck midnight yet and the air was warm. I was a little stunned. The movement from that delightful place of escapism to the immediate reminder of present life left me pondering. There is so little I connect with today. Not just today the cultural present, but also today the inner experience. I feel like a shroud is gradually getting laid over my consciousness and I am fading to obscurity. Brain damage is described as a loss of consciousness. Now I am not hammering full time employment out I scarcely am desirous to remain awake or active for the majority of the 24 hour clock. I prefer to waste in bed fighting anxious calls to get up if I've laid in far too long.
But then I also have dreams. This morning I dreamt about the tomato plant on my balcony I've solidly neglected. It was a gift. In my dream I saw the plant had wasted away and I needed to give it water. Inside I felt genuine protectiveness and externalization to this plant. A feeling so well remembered in the dream, so patently absent in waking life: externalized care. It felt natural and affirming of my humanity. For I wake to have the day erode higher creativity and strap a harried consciousness with mundane questions like as if I were frustrated Gilles' novel wasn't shown to succeed or fail. The question is will Gilles succeed or fail. This has to do with his life choices, not accomplishments.
I have swum through the last three months in thick, tepid waters. Social isolation. Plenty of time to reflect. A creeping sense I am losing my God-given self-consciousness. I am replaced with autonomic self-awkwardness. Treading water and lasting out to those around like they are buoys and not people also staying afloat on self-effort. No wonder I can latch onto anyone else. I would sink us both. I am struggling since I am not seeing the real human questions in my life right now. I am also fighting since I will not know which ones are genuine and which are proxies for internal tension.
Escapism is tremendous relief. Even the Bible remarks those who are in pain shall drink wine to forget their misery. All others risk ruining their lives with wine. There is some grief or affliction so great sometimes appropriate escape is given us to find naturally. Some escape I have done has been much more harmful than good. Drugs, sex, displaced aggression; these are a few that have given me more lashes than balms. And now I am needing to discover again, after so long a time of unrelenting fear and pain, how the human deals with these things so as not to make them lasting.
And I reflect how this same creature I wrestle now has come to me in seasons long past. Then my youth enabled less speculative methods of acquittal. More instinctive, too. It is coming back again to me now in the recognition I have fought this same creature before and after my life changing injury. And each time the infrastructure was there to do away with any prolonged stay. But now I am deceived and bewildered enough to assume I will always be disconnected if such uniformity of surround is even possible. Where is the me in this?